Unpeeling Orange
In April 2024, a statement released by the reThink board of directors, overseeing the ministry brand known as Orange, described founder Reggie Joiner’s past relationships as “inappropriate adult relationships” that violated company policy. This characterization has been widely criticized for downplaying the severity of the allegations. A survivor, who was 15 years old when Reggie began grooming her, came forward to share her testimony, revealing the depth of the abuse she endured. Her account sheds light on the institutional failures that allowed such abuse to persist.
The Survivor’s Testimony
The survivor describes her experience of being groomed by Reggie Joiner at the age of 15, a process that escalated into sexual abuse when she became an adult. She presented her testimony to reThink-retained HR counsel on April 18, 2024, and later met with two reThink board members in person. During this meeting, she alleges that the board members dismissed her account, stating that the age difference between her and Reggie was not evidence of an abusive relationship and that her experience was not their concern due to her status as a contract worker.
Institutional Response and Accountability
The survivor’s efforts to seek justice were met with resistance and indifference. Despite providing detailed accounts of her abuse, she reports that the reThink board failed to amend their initial statement or take meaningful action. The investigation conducted by Castañeda + Heidelman LLP (C+H), retained by reThink/Orange, has been criticized for lacking transparency and failing to protect the anonymity of survivors. The survivor’s account raises serious questions about the board’s commitment to addressing abuse within their organization.
The Role of Kristen Ivy and Lauren Terrell
While the survivor’s statement does not explicitly mention Kristen Ivy or Lauren Terrell, the involvement of individuals connected to the organization raises further questions. Kristen Ivy, known for her work with Orange, and her sister Lauren Terrell, have been subjects of public interest in relation to the abuse allegations. The survivor’s account prompts inquiries into the extent of awareness and involvement of individuals within the organization regarding the abuse perpetrated by Reggie Joiner.
Conclusion
The survivor’s testimony serves as a powerful reminder of the importance of listening to and believing those who come forward with accounts of abuse. It underscores the need for organizations to take immediate and decisive action to protect individuals and hold perpetrators accountable. The ongoing investigation and public discourse surrounding these allegations highlight the necessity for transparency, justice, and support for survivors in their pursuit of healing and justice.
For more information and to read the full survivor’s statement, visit Hagar’s Voice.
